Nunatsiaq Online
NEWS: Nunavut October 01, 2009 - 9:33 am

Blunt report recommends sweeping changes to GN

"The expectations most people had of Nunavut have not yet been met”

JIM BELL
Piers McDonald, the former Yukon premier who led the team that produced the Qanukkanniq report card on the Government of Nunavut, released at 9:00 a.m., Oct 1, said Nunavut represents a
Piers McDonald, the former Yukon premier who led the team that produced the Qanukkanniq report card on the Government of Nunavut, released at 9:00 a.m., Oct 1, said Nunavut represents a "compelling ideal" and that there is much hope for the future. (PHOTO BY JIM BELL)

(Updated 3:15 p.m., Oct. 1, with corrections for grammar, punctuation, spelling and style.)

A sweeping report on the quality of relations between the people of Nunavut and their territorial government recommends big changes in how the Government of Nunavut does its work.

North Sky Consulting, a group led by Piers McDonald, a former premier of Yukon, unveiled the Qanukkanniq report card on the Government of Nunavut Oct. 1

Like almost everyone else who works at the Nunavut legislature in Iqaluit, just about the first thing Premier Eva Aariak did this morning was run upstairs to read it.

That’s because everyone, Nunavut government officials included, got to see the document at the same time.

“When I first saw Piers this morning he asked me how I was and I said ‘anxious,’” Aariak joked when McDonald handed the report material to her.

Aariak ordered the report card earlier this year in the face of widespread dissatisfaction with the quality of government offered by the GN.

She said she wanted the consulting team to find out what works, what needs improvement and what isn’t working at all.

On receiving the report, Aariak thanked the 2,106 Nunavut residents who shared their views with North Sky’s researchers.

“You have clearly outlined the issues that are most important to you and shown that you care deeply about finding solutions,”  Aariak said.

She said the full caucus of MLAs will meet later this month to complete their action plan, in response to the report card.

“Now that we have heard from you, we look forward to moving forward with your mandate,” Aariak said.

Much of what the consultants found is not flattering.

“Without doubt, the expectations most people had of Nunavut at its inception have not yet been met,” they wrote in their report.

McDonald said his team recommends that the GN’s first priority should be improved communications.

“More than anything else, Nunavummiut said that communication with their government is very poor… When they think they know who to phone, nobody answers,” the North Sky report says.

He also said communication between units of government needs much improvement.

“Communications within and between departments is woefully inadequate; some staff found out about important government or even department initiatives through the media,” the report says.

At the same time, co-operation between departments is “inadequate and, in some instances, entirely absent.”

He said all this, combined with poor financial management systems and reporting procedures, makes it impossible for the GN to provide good service to Nunavut residents.

The report also found senior managers don’t stay in their jobs long enough to follow through on major, long-term projects.

To that end, consultants recommended that top managers should be kept in their jobs for longer periods.

And to deal with the absence of communication between departments, the consultants recommended the GN create a priorities implementation committee make sure that priority work gets done.

As for staffing, the consultants found there are numerous employees who are not qualified for their jobs and who are not getting proper training.

They also noted a conflict between those who believe the GN should hire more Inuit and those who believe too many under-qualified people have been given government jobs to satisfy Article 23 of the Nunavut land claims agreement.

“Some GN staff expressed concerns that non-Inuit people dominated the managerial ranks. Others stated that too many individuals, including those hired to fill Article 23 ‘Inuit quotas,’ were underskilled and left to fend for themselves without proper training or job orientation,” the report says.

Another big GN scheme, decentralization, got a thorough pasting in the North Sky report.

The consultants said many people told them the decentralization of government jobs to communities outside the capital is “expensive and wasteful,” and that the assumed benefits never materialized.

That’s because people in the communities says few local people are qualified for decentralized jobs and there has been little economic stimulus.

At the same time, under-housed permanent residents of many communities resent outsiders who take government jobs and the staff housing that goes with them.

And within the government, many GN employees say decentralization has made decision-making more convoluted and that some decentralized offices have never been properly integrated into their departments.

To fix this, the consultants recommend a review of decentralization “to determine what can be salvaged.”

The consulting team’s recommendations include the following:

• the GN must improve communications within the government and with the public;

• support senior management to improve stability and so longer-term projects can be completed;

• more collaboration between government departments, through a priorities implementation committee;

• more basic tools including good financial information and more reliable IT systems;

• more hiring on merit, more support for existing staff with better training, and orientation for new staff;

• the GN do an operational review of decentralization to see what can be salvaged from it.

And in response to widespread concerns about social conditions, the consultants recommend the GN immediately fund a program to provide snacks and nutritious food for children and the development of a poverty reduction strategy.

As part of that, they also recommend a major review of of the income support program.


Read the Qanukkanniq material for yourself:

Qanukkanniq GN Report Card (PDF, 692k)

List of Recommendations (PDF, 136k)

What We Heard (PDF, 960k)

Fact Sheet on Consultation Process (PDF, 160k

North Sky News Release (PDF, 248k)

Email this story to a friend... Print this page... Bookmark and Share Comment on this story...

(6) Comments:

#1. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 01, 2009

This report card makes public and official what has been known for years.

Its a valuable exercise, but the report card won’t be worth the paper its written on if its not followed through.

Regular M-L-A’s must demand scheduled progress reports from cabinet, similar to the federal government’s updates on the stimulus package.

Make the changes happen…fill the vacant positions with qualified people and use the civil service to improve life for all of us.

#2. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 01, 2009

If you break-down the participation percentages by community, you’ll notice that, in order from first to last, the smaller communities, in general, participated the greatest:

1. Grise Fiord - 43%
2. Resolute - 25.5%
3. Arctic Bay - 19.1%
4. Sanikiluaq - 15.4%
5. Kugaaruk - 11.6%
. .
. 21. Taloyoak - 32.%
22. Cambridge Bay - 3.1%
23. Coral Harbour - 2.4%
24. Rankin Inlet - 1.9%
25. Baker Lake - 1.8%

Further to that, if you order by the decentralized communities(with GN offices), you’ll notice a majority of those communities fall at the bottom-end of the participation rates.

7. Igloolik - 9.2%
12. Pond Inlet - 7.6%
13. Iqaluit - 7.3%
15. Gjoa Haven - 5%
16. Pangnirtung - 4.9
17. Arviat - 4.9%
19. Cape Dorset - 4.8%
20. Kugluktuk - 4.2%
22. Cambridge Bay - 3.1%
24. Rankin Inlet - 1.9%
25. Baker Lake - 1.8%

The people with “the least”, contributed the most.

#3. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 02, 2009

For those of us who’ve lived in Nunavut for many years and worked or lived under the GNWT, we knew that the establishment of a new gov’t, especially a decentralized gov’t, was going to be a very tall task.

The bureaucratic power vaccuum and the empire building that has gone on since April 1999, has not done us any service in terms of growth and building a functional workforce team. The turnover rate is insane; Inuit thrown into positions they’re not qualified for from top to bottom.

As someone who has worked for the GNWT/GN for nearly 15 years, I am frustrated trying to do my job, get support to provide the services I’m paid to provide. BUT where else do we turn to? Definitely NOT the MLA’s or Cabinet, NOT the DM’s or ADM’s and certainly NOT our so-called senior managers.

Communication is also a MAJOR issue. In this day & age of the Internet, there’s no excuse either externally to the public or internally within the GN. Time to clean house in many Dept’s!

#4. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 02, 2009

The bureaucratic system is getting so, that it is hard to run a business. We thought the creation of Nunavut was to get away from that system where the high level government official are gods to be feared.

#5. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 03, 2009

To GN employee


If you think you are frustrated you should have been an SAO trying to deal with the GN. The GN never got it through their noggins that Hamlets are Incorporated bodies and the GN doesn’t run the Hamlets. The mayor and council do and are administered by the SAO via the Hamlets Act. Get it: it’s an Act. For some reason only known to God the GN seemed to think the SAO’s were GN employees. Go figger. However when the AG gets her gang in: there will be some attitude adjustments coming and big time I suspect. I know the AG has a lot of power but with her suggestion to step in : I am suspicious this just might be coming from the PMO.

But on balance you have all my empathy and sympathy I can toss your way…..fear not you are not alone. There are some really dedicated and well qualified people in the GN and lets hope they get their/your day in the spotlight.

#6. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 03, 2009

Thanks Frances

Personally, I don’t want to be in the spotlight, just want to do my job and provide the services I am expected to provide.

I hear you on the GN attitude towards the Hamlets & the Act. GNWT & GN have always had a condescending & paternalistic attitude towards the Hamlets and its residents. “There, there now, we know what’s best for you!” 20+ years later it hasn’t changed.

I also understand the importance of adhering to the spirit & letter of the Acts. Most of the GN bureaucracy doesn’t know or follow their own FAA & FAM directives.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


 THIS WEEK’S ADS

 ADVERTISING


        


Custom Search