Nunatsiaq Online
NEWS: Nunavut October 25, 2009 - 9:16 am

I’ll challenge “negative” press, Patterson says

Nunavut senator says it's time to act on devolution, food mail

JIM BELL
Nunavut Senator Dennis Patterson at the Qikiqtani Inuit Association's board meeting in Iqaluit Oct. 23. (PHOTO BY JIM BELL)
Nunavut Senator Dennis Patterson at the Qikiqtani Inuit Association's board meeting in Iqaluit Oct. 23. (PHOTO BY JIM BELL)

Nunavut’s newly appointed senator, Dennis Patterson, told the Qikiqtani Inuit Association’s directors last week that he’ll use his upcoming maiden speech in the Red Chamber to challenge recent national newspaper articles that portray the Nunavut territory as a failure.

“There have been a lot of negative reports in the national press about Nunavut… I’m going to challenge these negative views,” Patterson said.

Patterson, who spoke to QIA’s board of directors on the afternoon of Oct. 23, said he disagrees with a column by Jeffrey Simpson published Oct. 20 in the Globe and Mail, entitled “Nunavut’s economic dreams are icebound.”

Also on Oct. 20, the Globe published a news story, “Ten years in, Nunavut gets failing grade,” which was based on the results of the Nunavut government’s Qanukkanniq Report Card.

These articles depict Nunavut’s future prospects in an excessively bleak manner, Patterson told QIA’s board.

“There is no reason to be hopeless. We have to be positive,” he said.

Patterson had just finished telling QIA directors that Ottawa’s perception of Nunavut’s capacity problems is likely making the federal government reluctant about moving forward on the devolution of responsibility for public lands and resources.

Paul Mayer, a Montreal lawyer hired in 2006 to advise the federal government on the issue, recommended that devolution talks move slowly and be tied to improvements in Nunavut’s human resource capacity.

After that, the Government of Nunavut, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. and the federal government signed a protocol setting out what the first phase of devolution talks would cover.

But because the federal cabinet has yet to authorize a negotiating mandate, formal devolution negotiations haven’t yet started.

“There’s been almost three years of talk, but nothing has happened,” Patterson said.

He said that if the federal government is concerned about the territory’s capacity problems, then it should do more to help Nunavut fix those problems.

And that means Ottawa should make training a priority when devolution talks start, Patterson said.

Another issue that needs more action is reform of the food mail program, Patterson said.

“Our interest is seeing the program go back to its original purpose, providing affordable food,” he said.

Graeme Dargo, a Yellowknife consultant, submitted a sweeping review of the program earlier this year, recommending that Ottawa stop using Canada Post to run it and instead, work out direct, transparent subsidies with food retailers like the Northwest Co. and Arctic Co-operatives Ltd.

Officials with Indian and Northern Affairs Canada also produced reports on the food mail program, but Chuck Strahl, the northern affairs minister, has yet to announce a decision.

Patterson also said that he, and Nunavut MP Leona Aglukkaq, recently did some lobbying on behalf of Inuit corporations who are worried about the status of their contract for support and logistical work on North Warning System radar sites across the Arctic.

Since the mid-1990s, seven Inuit birthright corporations stretching from Labrador to the Northwest Territories have held that contract in a joint venture with a subsidiary of Atco Ltd., an Edmonton-based corporation that provides logistical support to defence installations, airports and mine sites around the world.

The Inuit-Atco joint venture firm, Nasittuq Corp., is a big revenue producer for the seven Inuit corporations.

But the federal government is now taking “a different approach” to Inuit contracting, and that’s made the Nassittuq partners nervous about their chances of getting the contract after it’s renewed.

Patterson said he and Aglukkaq have already held one meeting with Chuck Strahl on the Nasittuq contract and have scheduled another for next week.

“We are going to stay on top of this issue,” Patterson said.

Email this story to a friend... Print this page... Bookmark and Share Comment on this story...

(5) Comments:

#1. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 25, 2009

“I’ll challenge “negative” press, Patterson says”

That’s a lot easier (and cheaper) (and safer) than doing anything about the problems.

#2. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 25, 2009

Kudos to Patterson for addressing these problems head-on.

However, the Food Mail report is flawed IMHO.  A good way to provide affordable to foods to all communities is to allow Hamlets to bulk-order foods based on individual family orders, and then allow people to pay cash or debit at the hamlet office for their food orders.

That report suggest handing over delivery of food mail to private corporations - who’s legal responsibility is first and foremost profitability.  Anyone who’s seen a $200 Turkey knows this.

And when it comes to devolution, our leaders should spend less time fighting for it when we can see for ourselves we’re having problems fulfilling the responsibilities we do have.  A better solution would be to fight for training aspects of the NLCA, no?

#3. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 25, 2009

Why are being hopeless and being positive the only two options? Nunavut’s false dichotomy machine working full-tilt again. We need to be hopeful that we will to improve the situation when we are forced to look at negative, but FACTUAL, data.

And anyone in Nunavut who thinks devolution talks should move at a different speed is dreaming. Nunavut hasn’t been trying to train people? Fill the vacant GN spots with Inuit? Devolution talks are going to make this process easier? By creating more Inuit or removing positions from org charts? You can’t conjure human-resource capacity from thin air, no matter how much money you think you can get to try it.

When the Yukon and NWT have serious movement with their devolution talks, then the senator from “Nunavut” should make Nunavut devolution a priority. Until then it’s just a talking point to fill space in a speech.

#4. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on October 25, 2009

The recent articles may be negative, but they are true. 

Sure, there are some positive things to say but the negatives ones need desperate attention AND solutions.

#5. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 12, 2009

I’ve just been reading about this 10 year report card and I googled “devolution talks, Nunavut.”

Three years and no start to the talks?

How much revenue does Ottawa get for your resources per year?

It’s long been my hope that Canada grant all the First People the economic bases necessary for self-government.

That ought to be the case for Nunavut.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


 THIS WEEK’S ADS

 ADVERTISING


        


Custom Search