Nunatsiaq Online
NEWS: Around the Arctic November 24, 2009 - 11:25 am

Nunavut not guaranteed future turbot quota

Government response to Senate report says no one has a right to fish

CHRIS WINDEYER
Federal fisheries minister Gail Shea speaks during a news conference in Iqaluit Nov. 9. Shea was in Nunavut to announce a 1,500-tonne increase to the Area 0B turbot quota.
Federal fisheries minister Gail Shea speaks during a news conference in Iqaluit Nov. 9. Shea was in Nunavut to announce a 1,500-tonne increase to the Area 0B turbot quota. (PHOTO BY CHRIS WINDEYER)

Ottawa won’t guarantee Nunavut interests the first right to buy turbot quota when southern fishing companies are selling, according to a government response to a Senate fisheries committee report.

The Senate report, published this past June, echoed the demands of Nunavut fishing industry, who want the right of first refusal to buy turbot quota.

But while the federal government said it’s prepared to “work with Nunavut stakeholders” to find ways to increase the size of Nunavut’s turbot fishery, it’s Ottawa’s view that quota doesn’t belong to Nunavut by right.

“No individual or organization can claim an interest in a license to fish, assert a right to receive a license to fish, or assert a right to be allocated a fishing quota,” reads a government response to the Senate committee’s recommendations.

But the government appears to promise that any new licenses or quotas in Area 0B, off southeast Baffin Island, would go to Nunavut interests.

The response quotes a 2001 study that recommends Nunavut get help increasing its share of the turbot catch. But the response doesn’t make any specific promises about how to do that.

Earlier this month, federal fisheries minister Gail Shea announced that Nunavut would get 90 per cent of a 1,500-tonne increase in the area 0B.

“It is an improvement,” said Jerry Ward, chief executive officer of the Baffin Fisheries Coalition, at the time Shea made the announcement. “We hope that future increases will all go the way of Nunavut.”

Nunavut fishing interests now control 41 per cent of the Baffin turbot quota. Most of the rest is held by East Coast fishing companies and a small share is held by Nunavik as part of the Nunavik Inuit land claims agreement.

A January federal court ruling also requires Ottawa to consult with Nunavut when southern fishing companies sell Nunavut turbot quota to one another.

The Conservative government does support a recommendation that Nunavut continue to control all of the 6,500-tonne turbot fishery in area 0A, off the east central coast of Baffin Island.

The Senate committee report also urged the government to build as many as six more small craft harbours in Nunavut, in addition to the one already under construction in Pangnirtung.

But the government response said there are “no immediate plans” to build more docks. Instead, the response stated “discussions continue with the Government of Nunavut regarding infrastructure needs to further support local fisheries.”

During Nunavut Tunngavik Inc.’s annual meeting in Apex last week, Jose Kusugak, president of the Kivalliq Inuit Association, called on the Government of Nunavut, NTI and the regional Inuit associations to meet next year to discuss marine infrastructure in Nunavut.

Email this story to a friend... Print this page... Bookmark and Share Comment on this story...

(2) Comments:

#1. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 24, 2009

I bet she didn’t know that Nunavut existed.  How can we gain autonomy when the government don’t want to help us Nunavummiut?

#2. Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 24, 2009

It isn’t that the Feds do not wish to ‘help’ Nunavut, it’s that Nunavut simply does not have the infrastructure to support a full-fledged fishing industry. The current players in fishing partner with southern companies to operate. If Nunavut was awarded what was denied in the article, who would ultimately benefit? Some money, in the form of royalties, would flow back to some individuals in NU but probably wouldn’t have any impact on the community benefiting.  The rest of the money would go to the southern companies who own, operate, process, and ship, the harvest.  Mr. Kusugak is correct in suggesting some sort of consortium on fishing infrastructure, however, it should of already happened…years ago. Here comes Nunavut trailing behind again…

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


 THIS WEEK’S ADS

 ADVERTISING


        


Custom Search